Skip to main content

Bid Analysis: Overview

Your workspace for go/no-go decisions — how opportunities are organised, and the components you use to build decision boards around your own criteria.

h
Written by henry brogan

Bid Analysis is where you decide whether an opportunity is worth bidding for. It lets you evaluate every dimension of a tender — client, market, delivery capability, commercial viability — before committing resources.

The defining feature is that you configure your own go/no-go criteria directly in the platform. Rather than working through a fixed checklist, you build decision boards that mirror how your organisation actually makes these calls, and reuse them across future opportunities.

Where to find it

In the left-hand sidebar, click Bid Analysis.

Viewing your opportunities

Opportunities can be viewed two ways, in the same manner as Projects.

Table view

A structured list. Best for scanning and sorting a large number of opportunities.

Board view

Cards grouped into columns. Best for seeing where opportunities sit at a glance.

Filtering and ordering

You can filter and order opportunities by:

  • Deadlines

  • Opportunities

  • Name

  • Client

  • Contract value

  • Analysis steps

Order ascending or descending in either view. Sorting by deadline is the fastest way to see which decisions cannot wait.

How a go/no-go decision works

The process runs in four steps:

1. Create the opportunity

Name it, add the client, and upload the tender documents.

2. Build an analysis board

From scratch, from a saved template, or by having BidBot build it from your existing criteria.

3. Analyse

Work through the board, using BidBot to interrogate the tender pack.

4. Decide

Mark the opportunity Go or No-Go.

The components you build with

Boards are assembled from components. You choose which to use and how to arrange them, so a board can be as bespoke as your decision process requires.

Notes and text

Free-form notes and text.

Charts

Pie, line, trend, part-to-whole and ranking charts.

Tables and frameworks

Scorecards, criteria matrices, milestone timelines and risk registers.

Narrative

Narrative, executive narrative, and evidence and rationale.

You can configure any component or decision criterion you want. BidBot builds these for you on request — see BidBot in Bid Analysis.

What to put on a board

Because boards are fully custom, the useful question is not what components exist but what your decision actually needs to weigh. Most organisations cover some combination of the following.

Strategic evaluation

  • Evaluation criteria and how the bid will be judged

  • Key points, risks and opportunities

  • Blind spots — critical information that is missing or unknown, such as an undisclosed budget or absent evaluation criteria

  • SWOT assessment

  • Time remaining until the submission deadline

Contract information

  • Commissioning authority — who is issuing the tender, and what that means for reputation, payment history and relationship value

  • Contract name and how it aligns with your strategy

  • Summary of the scope of works or specification — scope, deliverables, service levels and constraints

  • Contract duration, supporting resourcing and cash flow planning

  • Submission date

Submission requirements

  • Word, page and character counts and limits

  • Format requirements — PDF, DOCX, or an online portal

  • Required appendices and supporting documents, such as CVs, case studies, financials and references

Evaluation criteria

  • Award criteria, such as the price-to-quality weighting

  • Evaluation process and scoring methodology

  • Scored weightings per criterion, guiding where to focus effort

Commercial terms

  • Number of providers — single or multi-supplier award, and what that means for win probability

  • Lots, and price per lot

  • Performance and service levels — KPIs, uptime, reporting frequency

  • Margin and profitability scenarios

  • Total and annualised contract value

Risk and compliance

  • Killer questions — the binary mandatory requirements that rule you out if unmet

  • Required accreditations and qualifications

  • TUPE obligations affecting workforce planning and cost modelling

The killer-question checklist is worth building first on any board. A single unmet mandatory requirement ends the decision, and finding that out early saves the rest of the analysis.

Getting set up

If you are onboarding and want help configuring your first boards around your existing decision criteria, contact your support manager or email [email protected].

Related articles

Did this answer your question?